PRESS RELEASE, March 3, 1999
Wichita Falls, Texas: Wednesday, March 3, 1999.
FLIGHT TESTS CONTINUE AT SHEPPARD AFB
On Saturday, February 20, CARTERCOPTERS L.L.C. resumed flight testing
of the CarterCopter at Sheppard Air Force Base (Wichita Falls, Texas).
Don Farrington flew the aircraft for 0.5 hours total flight time. Testing
was then cancelled due to strong crosswinds gusting to 30 MPH and a problem
with the left muffler.
Both of the aircraft's mufflers, made from 304 S/S and located inside
the engine compartment, had been wrapped with new insulation following
the flights on February 6 & 7. The insulation was necessary to prevent
heat damage to nearby electrical components. The new insulation appears
to have contained exhaust temperatures inside the exhaust system so effectively
that extreme heat build-up caused metallurgical failure in the muffler.
The baffles wadded - choking the exhaust. The sudden constriction caused
exhaust gases to separate the muffler's flanges.
The exhaust system was totally rebuilt during the following week. The
mufflers were eliminated. The exhausts from the headers were merged into
a single 321 S/S pipe on each side of the engine that was run directly
to the outside of the cowling. The pipes were wrapped with insulation.
The exposure of engine components to the high exhaust temperatures is
now minimized without greatly increasing external noise levels.
This past weekend, February 27 & 28, Don Farrington again flew the
CarterCopter - adding 2 additional hours of flight time. The engine was
using more oil than expected and horsepower had dropped off slightly,
so flights were again limited to the length of the runway. Other than
that, the aircraft performed flawlessly both days. As in past flight tests,
the testing was halted every 3-4 flights and all flight-critical aircraft
components and controls were checked.
PLANNING THE NEXT STEPS WHILE CRITICAL COMPONENTS ARE
CHECKED.
The objective Saturday was to collect more data on the CarterCopter's
flight characteristics. The aircraft's test weight was slightly more than
3100 pounds. Takeoff speeds of 50-60 MPH consistently used less than 150
feet of runway. Numerous repeatable data points were collected on stabilized
flights down the runway at 90-100 MPH with varying combinations of cyclic,
collective, and horizontal stabilator angles. Rotor-blade pitch was varied
in flight from 0 to 5 degrees (8 degrees of a maximum 12 degrees was used
during short field takeoffs). Different combinations of collective and
forward speeds for given rotor RPMs, stick forces, and stick shake were
investigated. Some stick shake and increased stick forces were encountered
upon reaching 100 MPH, so flights were limited to this speed. Telemetry
data showed that the aircraft would have steadily accelerated through
this speed if permitted to do so.
It was decided that before attempting to fly faster than 100 MPH, the
distance between the blade teetering axis and the blade spar would be
increased. The closer the teetering axis is to the rotor center of gravity
(CG), the less stick shake will occur due to blade flapping. To reduce
the stick forces, the spindle tilt axis will be moved closer to the rotor
aerodynamic center -- which also happens to be very close to the rotor
CG. To make these changes, some of the rotor head components must be rebuilt.
The new rotor head assembly may require 2 months to design, detail, and
build. It can then be installed in a week. The portion of Phase II flight-testing
that explores the speed range between 100-150 MPH will be delayed until
this rebuild is completed.
With exploration of the higher speed ranges put on temporary hold, the
objective Sunday was for Don Farrington to begin preliminary Phase III
testing. This plan included slowly developing the techniques needed for
zero roll takeoffs and landings.
Everything went as predicted. The preliminary jump takeoffs required
rolls of only 25 feet with speeds of 20-30 MPH. Beginning with a reduced
over-speed rotor RPM at the start of the takeoff roll, the collective
was gradually increased from zero to 8 degrees in 3.5 seconds. Once airborne,
flight speeds of 50 MPH were reached in 6 seconds. Landing speeds of 20
MPH were obtained by flaring the aircraft with the use of collective.
By the time flight-testing ended, Don felt comfortable with the control
system and aircraft performance.
HERE WE GO AGAIN ! (Top Right)
After examining the data gathered this past weekend, we feel relatively
confident we will achieve our design goals for zero-roll takeoffs and
landings. We hope to return to the 5,000 feet runway at Olney, Texas,
during the Week of March 15th to resume the Phase III testing
begun this past Sunday. In the interim, we will tear down the engine for
a complete inspection. We will increase the horsepower rating from 225
hp to 300 hp by installing new pistons to increase compression from 8.8:1
to 11:1. Even with the increased horsepower rating, the engine will remain
de-rated from its designed potential. We will also remove the front landing
gear extension in expectation of doing full zero roll takeoffs and landings.
Without the extension, we will have the option of raising the landing
gear in flight for the first time. If "power-off" landing tests
from 100 feet altitude proceed as expected, then with confidence that
the engine is OK, we will feel comfortable to fly airport patterns. We
will be finished with Phase II testing when we have flown between minimum
safe slow speed flight and 150 mph at varying combinations of cyclic,
collective, and horizontal stabilator angles. Testing will continue until
we fully understand how the aircraft is flying; i.e. our analytic analysis
agrees with actual flight data. Once this milestone is complete, we can
start work on zero-roll take-offs/landings; phase III flight testing.
Phase IV flight testing will determine the maximum safe forward airspeed
that can be attained at the lowest rotor RPM possible.

ONE OF MANY FLIGHTS DOWN THE RUNWAY.

STAN CLINES AND MARK ROBINSON INSPECT ALL MAJOR FLIGHT
COMPONENTS.
|